General Rileys Route
Small historically significant California Gold Rush map titled "Sketch of General Riley's Route through the Mining Districts". Historical Context The Creator: The map was originally sketched by Lt. George Horatio Derby of the U.S. Army Corps of Topographical Engineers. It was copied by John McHenry Hollingsworth and published in 1850.The Mission: It documents the official 1849 reconnaissance tour of Brigadier General Bennet Riley, the last military governor of California, during the chaotic early days of the Gold Rush.The Goal: The military group traveled across the central valley to survey strategic logistics routes, map out temporary settlements, and locate sites for army posts to keep the peace between gold prospectors and native populations.Cartographic Significance First Mentions: This document is highly prized by historians because it labels several iconic Sierra foothill mining camps for the very first time on a printed map.Historical Locations: It documents early locations like Coloma (spelled "Colluma"), Mormon Island (spelled "Mormont"), Sonora ("Sororam Camp"), Jamestown, Angel's Camp, and Woods Creek.Daily Tracking: The map tracks the exact route day-by-day with timeline markers from July 10 to August 20, 1849, charting their movement from Monterey up through San Francisco and into the major central valley river branches.
Before
Disclaimer
The object and/or subject of this report is private property. This page is for informational purposes only. Unless clearly stated otherwise, all conservation and restoration has been performed by Poster Mountain (PM) or Los Angeles Paper Group (LAPG)I) PM-LAPG has not knowingly withheld any significant information from its evaluation report and to the best of its knowledge all statements and evaluations in this report are true and correct.
II) PM-LAPG stated in the Evaluation Report its own personal, unbiased and professional analysis, opinions and conclusions, which are subject to the assumptions and limited conditions in this evaluation report as set forth hereinabove.
III) PM-LAPG has no present or prospective interests in the property which is the subject matter of this report and it has no present or prospective personal interests or bias with respect to the participants in this matter.
IV) PM-LAPG and its employment and/or compensation for performing this evaluation or any future anticipated evaluation was not conditioned on any agreement or understanding, written or otherwise, that it would report (or present analysis in support) as predetermined specific authenticity, a predetermined evaluation that favors the cause of any party or the attainment of any specific result or occurrence of a specific subsequent event, such as value or marketability.
V) PM-LAPG prepared all opinions and conclusions about the subject property that were set forth in this Evaluation Report. If it has relied on significant evaluation assistance from any individual or individuals in the performance of this evaluation or the appropriation of this evaluation report, PM-LAPG has named such individuals and disclosed the specific task performed in this evaluation report. PM-LAPG certifies that any individual so named is qualified to the same extent as PM to perform the task. PM-LAPG has not authorized anyone to make a change to any item in this evaluation report, therefore, any change made to this evaluation is unauthorized and PM-LAPG will not take responsibility for it.
VI) The Client may not disclose or distribute this Evaluation Report to any potential purchasers of the subject property without first obtaining PM-LAPG's prior written consent. This consent must be obtained before this evaluation report may be disclosed or distributed to any other party, including, but not limited to, the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media.