Tube Map #2
40 x 50, royal quad, This is an historical London Underground map, likely from the early 20th century, before the now-iconic diagrammatic style was adopted
. This map is a geographical representation, meaning it attempts to show the train lines in their actual locations relative to the city streets and the River Thames.
This "geographical" style was used for the earliest London Underground maps, which were first produced in the 1860s and 1870s and became a single system-wide map in 1908. This design style had limitations, as the crowded central London area was difficult to read as the network expanded. This led to the development of a more simplified, diagrammatic map by Harry Beck in 1931, which was first published in 1933.
Based on the style and the lines shown, the map appears to be from a period around the 1910s to the 1920s. This is distinct from Beck's revolutionary design, which was based on electrical circuit diagrams and disregarded geographical accuracy in favor of clarity and readability
. This map is a geographical representation, meaning it attempts to show the train lines in their actual locations relative to the city streets and the River Thames.
This "geographical" style was used for the earliest London Underground maps, which were first produced in the 1860s and 1870s and became a single system-wide map in 1908. This design style had limitations, as the crowded central London area was difficult to read as the network expanded. This led to the development of a more simplified, diagrammatic map by Harry Beck in 1931, which was first published in 1933.
Based on the style and the lines shown, the map appears to be from a period around the 1910s to the 1920s. This is distinct from Beck's revolutionary design, which was based on electrical circuit diagrams and disregarded geographical accuracy in favor of clarity and readability
Disclaimer
The object and/or subject of this report is private property. This page is for informational purposes only. Unless clearly stated otherwise, all conservation and restoration has been performed by Poster Mountain (PM) or Los Angeles Paper Group (LAPG)I) PM-LAPG has not knowingly withheld any significant information from its evaluation report and to the best of its knowledge all statements and evaluations in this report are true and correct.
II) PM-LAPG stated in the Evaluation Report its own personal, unbiased and professional analysis, opinions and conclusions, which are subject to the assumptions and limited conditions in this evaluation report as set forth hereinabove.
III) PM-LAPG has no present or prospective interests in the property which is the subject matter of this report and it has no present or prospective personal interests or bias with respect to the participants in this matter.
IV) PM-LAPG and its employment and/or compensation for performing this evaluation or any future anticipated evaluation was not conditioned on any agreement or understanding, written or otherwise, that it would report (or present analysis in support) as predetermined specific authenticity, a predetermined evaluation that favors the cause of any party or the attainment of any specific result or occurrence of a specific subsequent event, such as value or marketability.
V) PM-LAPG prepared all opinions and conclusions about the subject property that were set forth in this Evaluation Report. If it has relied on significant evaluation assistance from any individual or individuals in the performance of this evaluation or the appropriation of this evaluation report, PM-LAPG has named such individuals and disclosed the specific task performed in this evaluation report. PM-LAPG certifies that any individual so named is qualified to the same extent as PM to perform the task. PM-LAPG has not authorized anyone to make a change to any item in this evaluation report, therefore, any change made to this evaluation is unauthorized and PM-LAPG will not take responsibility for it.
VI) The Client may not disclose or distribute this Evaluation Report to any potential purchasers of the subject property without first obtaining PM-LAPG's prior written consent. This consent must be obtained before this evaluation report may be disclosed or distributed to any other party, including, but not limited to, the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media.


