Your Britain Fight for it now
Half sheet "Your Britain - Fight for it Now (School)", designed by Abram Games in 1942. It was part of a controversial series commissioned by the Army Bureau of Current Affairs (ABCA) to show soldiers the better future they were fighting for.
Poster Meaning and Symbolism
The design uses a stark visual contrast to advocate for post-war social reform:
The Past (Squalor and Neglect): The outer image shows the ruins of an old, dark Victorian school with broken furniture and a tattered map. This represents "Ignorance," one of the five "giants" (alongside Disease and Squalor) that society needed to overcome, according to the influential Beveridge Report of 1942.
The Future (Modernity): Superimposed in the center is a bright, airy vision of a modern school. This building is actually Impington Village College in Cambridgeshire, designed by Walter Gropius (founder of the Bauhaus) and Maxwell Fry. It was chosen to represent the "best developments in welfare and education".
The Message: By placing the modern "New Jerusalem" directly over the rubble of the old world, Games was telling the troops that their victory would lead to a reformed society with light, health, and quality education for all.
Controversy
While popular with the troops, the series was highly controversial among politicians:
Winston Churchill famously despised these posters, calling them a "disgraceful libel" on pre-war Britain.
He believed the ABCA was indoctrinating soldiers with socialist ideals and even ordered the health-themed version of the poster to be withdrawn and pulped.
Poster Meaning and Symbolism
The design uses a stark visual contrast to advocate for post-war social reform:
The Past (Squalor and Neglect): The outer image shows the ruins of an old, dark Victorian school with broken furniture and a tattered map. This represents "Ignorance," one of the five "giants" (alongside Disease and Squalor) that society needed to overcome, according to the influential Beveridge Report of 1942.
The Future (Modernity): Superimposed in the center is a bright, airy vision of a modern school. This building is actually Impington Village College in Cambridgeshire, designed by Walter Gropius (founder of the Bauhaus) and Maxwell Fry. It was chosen to represent the "best developments in welfare and education".
The Message: By placing the modern "New Jerusalem" directly over the rubble of the old world, Games was telling the troops that their victory would lead to a reformed society with light, health, and quality education for all.
Controversy
While popular with the troops, the series was highly controversial among politicians:
Winston Churchill famously despised these posters, calling them a "disgraceful libel" on pre-war Britain.
He believed the ABCA was indoctrinating soldiers with socialist ideals and even ordered the health-themed version of the poster to be withdrawn and pulped.
Disclaimer
The object and/or subject of this report is private property. This page is for informational purposes only. Unless clearly stated otherwise, all conservation and restoration has been performed by Poster Mountain (PM) or Los Angeles Paper Group (LAPG)I) PM-LAPG has not knowingly withheld any significant information from its evaluation report and to the best of its knowledge all statements and evaluations in this report are true and correct.
II) PM-LAPG stated in the Evaluation Report its own personal, unbiased and professional analysis, opinions and conclusions, which are subject to the assumptions and limited conditions in this evaluation report as set forth hereinabove.
III) PM-LAPG has no present or prospective interests in the property which is the subject matter of this report and it has no present or prospective personal interests or bias with respect to the participants in this matter.
IV) PM-LAPG and its employment and/or compensation for performing this evaluation or any future anticipated evaluation was not conditioned on any agreement or understanding, written or otherwise, that it would report (or present analysis in support) as predetermined specific authenticity, a predetermined evaluation that favors the cause of any party or the attainment of any specific result or occurrence of a specific subsequent event, such as value or marketability.
V) PM-LAPG prepared all opinions and conclusions about the subject property that were set forth in this Evaluation Report. If it has relied on significant evaluation assistance from any individual or individuals in the performance of this evaluation or the appropriation of this evaluation report, PM-LAPG has named such individuals and disclosed the specific task performed in this evaluation report. PM-LAPG certifies that any individual so named is qualified to the same extent as PM to perform the task. PM-LAPG has not authorized anyone to make a change to any item in this evaluation report, therefore, any change made to this evaluation is unauthorized and PM-LAPG will not take responsibility for it.
VI) The Client may not disclose or distribute this Evaluation Report to any potential purchasers of the subject property without first obtaining PM-LAPG's prior written consent. This consent must be obtained before this evaluation report may be disclosed or distributed to any other party, including, but not limited to, the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media.

