THE MUMMY
FAKE U.S. ONE SHEET RE-RELEASE, UNIVERSAL HORROR, BORIS KARLOFF, REALART RE-RELEASE
Procedures
Examination under black light, light table, microscope, digital imaging, visual and tactile observation. Documentation and evaluation by Lindsay Simmons of Poster Mountain Inc.Conclusion
THIS POSTER WAS NOT CONSERVED, NOR RESTORED BY POSTER MOUNTAIN INC. Poster was received initialed and dated on the lower border by owner. Poster is a reproduced one sheet of "The Mummy", printed from an ink jet (non-impact) printer in a style intending to replicate an offset lithography process. The poster appears to have been folded and is mounted on cotton canvas with a paper substrate.Under a microscope, the printer spray unique to ink jet printing (multiple color dots sprayed in order to create solid blocks of color) is apparent. The white colors are not true; instead they show cyan, magenta, yellow and black - the base colors for ink jet printing. The ink jet spray pattern is found in the other solid color blocks in this poster.
Examination on a light table reveals random damage: corner tack holes, 2 stamps on the verso (upper right and lower left) read "Independent Poster Exchange", and staining in the right border.
Under a blacklight the poster shows that the border has been painted and the U and M in the title have been damaged and in-painted.
The fold lines have been touched up with colored pencil.
Disclaimer
The object and/or subject of this report is private property. This page is for informational purposes only. Unless clearly stated otherwise, all conservation and restoration has been performed by Poster Mountain (PM) or Los Angeles Paper Group (LAPG)I) PM-LAPG has not knowingly withheld any significant information from its evaluation report and to the best of its knowledge all statements and evaluations in this report are true and correct.
II) PM-LAPG stated in the Evaluation Report its own personal, unbiased and professional analysis, opinions and conclusions, which are subject to the assumptions and limited conditions in this evaluation report as set forth hereinabove.
III) PM-LAPG has no present or prospective interests in the property which is the subject matter of this report and it has no present or prospective personal interests or bias with respect to the participants in this matter.
IV) PM-LAPG and its employment and/or compensation for performing this evaluation or any future anticipated evaluation was not conditioned on any agreement or understanding, written or otherwise, that it would report (or present analysis in support) as predetermined specific authenticity, a predetermined evaluation that favors the cause of any party or the attainment of any specific result or occurrence of a specific subsequent event, such as value or marketability.
V) PM-LAPG prepared all opinions and conclusions about the subject property that were set forth in this Evaluation Report. If it has relied on significant evaluation assistance from any individual or individuals in the performance of this evaluation or the appropriation of this evaluation report, PM-LAPG has named such individuals and disclosed the specific task performed in this evaluation report. PM-LAPG certifies that any individual so named is qualified to the same extent as PM to perform the task. PM-LAPG has not authorized anyone to make a change to any item in this evaluation report, therefore, any change made to this evaluation is unauthorized and PM-LAPG will not take responsibility for it.
VI) The Client may not disclose or distribute this Evaluation Report to any potential purchasers of the subject property without first obtaining PM-LAPG's prior written consent. This consent must be obtained before this evaluation report may be disclosed or distributed to any other party, including, but not limited to, the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media.